Defense of the Natural Horse
has been bred for generations and selected by nature, in conformity
to his surroundings. He may roam the plains, deserts or mountains,
but in doing so still choose his own terrain. The burden he carries
is not on his back, but in his spirit, as he strives to maintain his
place in the web of life. He will seek the lush grasses of spring
and summer that aid reproduction and growth, and forage sparingly
and shrewdly at other times. He will spend the winter surviving on
stored fat, horse sense and luck. A barrage of chemicals does not
enter his body to interrupt its internal functions. He more than likely
possesses a thick hide and coarse hair shaft and his stature is often
little above that of the largest pony. He travels for miles in search
of food and water, rarely standing in his own excrement or urine.
He often bears the heat and flies of summer and the harsh realities
of winter, as they are a constant in his life. He bands with respected
herd mates to protect himself from predators and the elements of nature.
He jumps logs, ditches and other obstacles as is necessary for survival
and frolic, yet generally chooses the path of least resistance. Most
unfamiliar creatures and events are deemed as foes or life threatening,
until experienced in a safe, well-known zone of comfort.
Is this natural horse your horse?
are bombarded these days with neo-classical ideas of equine training
and horse husbandry. We are told that the natural horse is best. We
have been told that it has taken evolution millions of years to produce
the natural horse described above and we should not interfere with
nature or we will suffer the consequences. Why then have so many horses
"adapted" reasonably well, in a comparatively short time
to shoes, shows, stalls (straight and box), saddles, bridles, bits,
wagons, trailering, neutering, changes in eating/sleeping patterns,
medicines, and yes, humans with all their foibles and desires.
How many of the natural conditions
can you discard and still have a natural horse? That is probably a
personal conclusion you will choose based on your comfort level as
you justify the ownership of your horse.
Rationally, we cannot eliminate a
vast number of variables and construe that every horse is better off
barefoot, in a stall, or left out side in all weather and all seasons.
Advocates of the natural horse who tell us a horse is better off outside,
had also better tell us to steer clear of climates with hurricanes,
tornados and weather that is minus twenty one day and plus five the
next if we choose to own the average, typical thoroughbred. Also,
plan on supplying it with double the amount of calories it would normally
need. May they suggest to us instead choosing breeds and types that
are known to "thrive" in such conditions, if indeed our
desire is to be the natural horse owner. (The isles of Shetland and
steppes of Mongolia watch out for the rush of would be buyers.)
Clinicians and others who want to
sell us on "natural" shoes (and boots and sneakers), "natural"
bridles, halters and saddles (making a profit in the process, yet
all for the good of the horse), need to present us with the whole
truth and allow us to make our own decisions. Except, like the quote
from the motion picture, many of us "can't handle the truth".
Human babies are born naked (naturally),
yet we clothe them. Any holes or body functions that are not normal
are deemed defects and modern medicine quickly employed. Yet our offspring
defeat us repeatedly by insisting on putting holes somewhere and colouring
their skin with dies and ultra violet rays. Do we consider these practices
unnatural? (some, of course, will say "yes") Yet where do
we draw the line? Do we all move to countries and climates that allow
for unlimited nakedness and body piercing to satisfy the desires of
some? I know of those who would die in the process of adapting.
It is quite evident to most non-horse
people (and indeed to many experienced horse people) that horses naturally
bite, kick, and attempt reproduction at times most inconvenient to
humans. Should we interfere with this naturalness and whisper to our
horses that there is a better way?
A number of people extol natural methods,
but tend to pick and choose which ones suit their particular personalities
and attributes, not their horse's. Some, who say our horse needs to
go barefoot, may also persuade us into vaccinating for every sniffle
We should be protecting our horses
as much as possible. We are jumping, reining, team penning, and flying
in airplanes to Olympic events. Horses are living in large groups
in smaller areas. They are being bred for specific purposes and may
lose traits that were a natural barrier to harm and disease. They
should not just be taking their chances with the situations they are
now presented with as part of our human world. As responsible owners
and human beings, it is a given that we regard the life of our animals.
We need to be offered unadulterated
advice, supplied by people who have very little to gain personally
(whether monetary or otherwise). We should not have untested drugs
or isolated practices pushed onto us by people who are being paid
to do so or who would lose their livelihood if they did not push.
People who sway the horse world without submitting rational alternatives
to their own, however ideological and pristine they may appear, can
be very unsafe.
To avoid both the pitfall of over
or under simplifying our horse's life, we need to moderate all our
equine experiments with sound advice, reason and intelligence.
Our horses MAY need a break from the
continuous intervention of man - but then, most horses today are only
alive because of such intervention.
The wise horse owner is one who gets
as many facts as possible and chooses not to be shamed or lured into
practices that may be harmful and not befitting to his own individual
horse's heritage and lifestyle.